Scholarly communication dan peran perpustakaan perguruan tinggi

  • Faizuddin Harliansyah Pustakawan Perpustakaan Pusat Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang


This paper presents an explanation of the understanding, the scope of scholarly communication and its relationship with the publishing business related to serial crises, open access, and the potential extension of the role (extended role) of academic libraries. Currently the role of the library only focuses on user education programs (library instruction) which aims to disseminate the collection/resources library and its search strategy, especially those that are online or electronic. This role is only alluding with a small area of scholarly communication, namely discovery and dissemination. A wider role is information literacy programs, whose materials are packaged, expanded and aligned with the dynamics and scores of scholarly communication. This role is expected to spur engagement and contribution in developing a scholarly communication environment that is conducive to the development of science.


Alexander, A., & Goodyear, M. (2000). Changing the role of research libraries in scholarly communication. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 5(3).

Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Comparing repository types: challenges and barriers for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. ArXiv:1005.0839 [Cs]. Retrieved from

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2003, June 24). Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication 1. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2013). Intersections of scholarly communication and information literacy: creating strategic collaborations for a changing academic environment. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research
Libraries. Retrieved from ections.pdf

Atkinson, R. (1996). Library functions, scholarly communication, and the foundation of the digital library: laying claim to the control zone. Library Quarterly, 66(3), 239–266.

Australasian Open Access Strategy Group. (2013, December 5). What is Open Access? Retrieved from

Berlin Declaration on Open Access. (2003, October 22). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. (2003, June 20). Bethesda statement on open access publishing. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from

Borgman, C. L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication Research, 16(5), 583–600.

Borgman, C. L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 412–430.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2017, February 14). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from

Davis, S. (1995). Surviving the serials crisis: are e-journals an answer? Serials Review, 21(4),95.

Davis-Kahl, S., & Hensley, M. K. (Eds.). (2013). Common ground at the nexus of information literacy and scholarly communication. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299–306.

Elsevier. (2017). What is peer review? Retrieved May 14, 2017, from

Graham, T. W. (2000). Scholarly communication. Serials, 13(1), 3–11.

Harloe, B., & Budd, J. M. (1994). Collection development and scholarly communication in the era of electronic access. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 83–88.

Joint Information Systems Committee. (2013, April 2). Implementing a virtual research environment (VRE). Retrieved May 2, 2017, from

Klain-Gabbay, L., & Shoham, S. (2016). Scholarly communication and academic librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 38(2), 170–179.

Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890–906. /(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AIDASI6>3.0.CO;2-8

Lynch, C. A. (1992). Reaction, response, and realization: from the crisis in scholarly communication to the age of networked information. Serials Review, 18(1/2), 107–114.

Lynch, C. A. (1994). Scholarly communication in the networked environment: Reconsidering economics and organizational missions. Serials Review, 20(3), 23–46.

Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336.

Malenfant, K. J. (2015). Leading Change in the System of Scholarly Communication: A Case Study of Engaging Liaison Librarians for Outreach to Faculty. College & Research Libraries, 76(3), 392–405.

McGuigan, G. S. (2004). Publishing perils in academe: the serials crisis and the economics of the academic journal publishing industry. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 10(1), 13–26.

Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. OECD. (2004, January 30). Declaration on access to research data from public funding. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from

Paisley, W. (1989). Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research. Communication Research, 16(5), 701–718.

Pascarelli, A. M. (1990). Coping strategies for libraries facing the serials crisis. Serials Review, 16(1), 75.

Profera, E., Jefferson, R., & Hosburgh, N. (2015). Personalizing library service to improve scholarly communication. Serials Librarian, 68(1–4), 274–281.

Rodriguez, J. E. (2015). Scholarly communications competencies: open access training for librarians. New Library World, 116(7/8), 397–405.

Roosendaal, H. E., & Geurts, P. A. T. M. (1997). Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay (pp. 1–32). Presented at the Conference on “Co-operative Research in Information Systems in Physics,” University of Oldenburg, Germany. Retrieved from

Schatzle, C. (2006). A proposed solution to the scholarly communications crisis. Journal of Access Services, 3(3), 37–47.

Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73–100.

Schwartz, C. A. (1994). The strength of weak ties in electronic development of the scholarly communication system. College & Research Libraries, 55(6), 529–541.

Shaughnessy, T. W. (1989). Scholarly communication: the need for an agenda for action--a symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 68–72.

Shearer, K., & Birdsall, W. F. (2005). A researcher’s research agenda for scholarly communication in Canada. New Review of Information Networking, 11(1), 99–108.

Ward, R., Michaelis, D., Murdoch, R., Roberts, B., & Blixrud, J. (2003). Widespread academic efforts address the scholarly communication crisis. College & Research Libraries News, 64(6), 382.

Ware, M. (2004). Pathfinder research on web-based repositories. London: Publisher and Library/Learning Solutions.

Wenzler, J. (2017). Scholarly communication and the dilemma of collective action: why academic journals cost too much. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 183–200.

Yiotis, K. (2005). The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications. Information Technology & Libraries, 24(4), 157–162.
How to Cite
HARLIANSYAH, Faizuddin. Scholarly communication dan peran perpustakaan perguruan tinggi. Shaut al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip & Dokumentasi, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-24, june 2017. ISSN 2339-1456. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 16 jan. 2018.